Opinion
April 10, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendants' contentions, we conclude that the documents submitted by the plaintiffs provided a sufficient basis for a court-appointed Referee to substantially comply with an order directing him to perform an accounting with regard to the income generated and expenditures incurred by the subject property (see, e.g., Matter of Skuse v Town of S. Bristol, 99 A.D.2d 670). Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.