From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Fabrizzio v. Clarity

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1947
273 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

December 8, 1947.


On the court's own motion, the decision of this court handed down December 1, 1947 ( ante, p. 769), is amended to read as follows: Action to recover damages for the unauthorized use by defendant, a photographer, of pictures of plaintiffs for trade purposes. Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. ( Holmes v. Underwood Underwood, Inc., 225 App. Div. 360. ) Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Di Fabrizzio v. Clarity

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1947
273 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Di Fabrizzio v. Clarity

Case Details

Full title:LUIS DI FABRIZZIO et al., Respondents, v. EDWARD D. CLARITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1947

Citations

273 App. Div. 775 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)