From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Costanzo v. Matthews Construction Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 12, 1971
275 A.2d 740 (N.J. 1971)

Opinion

Argued January 25, 1971 —Reargued April 5, 1971 —

Decided April 12, 1971.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mrs. Ruth Rabstein argued the cause for appellant ( Pellettieri and Rabstein, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Gladstone, on the brief).

Mr. Fred R. Daniels argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. John W. Taylor, attorney; Mr. Fred R. Daniels, of counsel).


The court being equally divided, the judgment of the Appellate Division whose opinion is reported in 110 N.J. Super. 383 (1970) is affirmed.

For affirmance — Justices FRANCIS, HALL and MOUNTAIN — 3.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS and PROCTOR — 3.


Summaries of

Di Costanzo v. Matthews Construction Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 12, 1971
275 A.2d 740 (N.J. 1971)
Case details for

Di Costanzo v. Matthews Construction Co.

Case Details

Full title:FIORE DI COSTANZO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 12, 1971

Citations

275 A.2d 740 (N.J. 1971)
275 A.2d 740

Citing Cases

Lister v. J.B. Eurell Co.

Further, the award of compensation must be based upon a claimant's disability at the time of the…

Kozinsky v. Edison Products Co.

Although it is not disputed that there was sufficient evidence to meet the Poswiatowski and Perez tests as to…