From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dhillon v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 26, 2013
3:11-CV-01269-JE (D. Or. Feb. 26, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-CV-01269-JE

02-26-2013

JACK DHILLON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (#31) on January 30, 2013, in which he recommends this Court reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand for an immediate award of benefits. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#31). Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this matter pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the calculation and award of benefits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dhillon v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 26, 2013
3:11-CV-01269-JE (D. Or. Feb. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Dhillon v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JACK DHILLON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 26, 2013

Citations

3:11-CV-01269-JE (D. Or. Feb. 26, 2013)