From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D.G. v. U. S.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 29, 2021
21-02122 SB (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)

Opinion

21-02122 SB (MRWx)

07-29-2021

D.G., a minor et al v. United States of America, et al


Present: The Honorable STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., U.S. District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: [In Chambers] ORDER REMANDING CASE

On June 30, 2021 the Court granted the unopposed request by Plaintiffs' counsel, Everardo Vargas, to withdraw as counsel of record for both Plaintiff D.G. and Plaintiff Maria Farjado. Dkt. No. 33. Upon permitting withdrawal, the Court dismissed the claims of Plaintiff D.G. without prejudice because he is a minor unable to proceed through an unrepresented guardian ad litem. The Court noted that, without Plaintiff D.G.'s claim, it appeared to lack subject matter jurisdiction and instructed the parties to meet and confer and submit a filing identifying the basis for jurisdiction by July 12, 2021. The Court warned that “[o]therwise, the Court will remand this matter.”

The parties did not submit a filing. Accordingly, this matter is hereby REMANDED.


Summaries of

D.G. v. U. S.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 29, 2021
21-02122 SB (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)
Case details for

D.G. v. U. S.

Case Details

Full title:D.G., a minor et al v. United States of America, et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 29, 2021

Citations

21-02122 SB (MRWx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)