From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deyo v. Eck

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 27, 2023
Civil Action 23-1658 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-1658

09-27-2023

NICHOLAS FRANCIS DEYO, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP R. ECK, Manor Township Police; CPL. TICE, Manor Township Police; OFC. HAAS, East Hempfield Police; OFC. TORRES, East Hempfield Police; CHRIS MILLER, District Attorney; CODY WADE, District Attorney; and CHERYL STEBERGER, Warden of the Lancaster County Prison, Defendants.


ORDER

EDWARD G. SMITH, J.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2023, after screening the amended complaint filed by the pro se plaintiff, Nicholas Francis Deyo (“Deyo”) (Doc. No. 25), as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2);and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

The court previously granted Deyo leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See June 5, 2023 Order at 1, Doc. No. 14.

1. The following claims in the amended complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: (a) claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Assistant District Attorneys Cody Wade and Chris Miller; (b) any claim for money damages for an alleged violation of the Pennsylvania Constitution; and (c) any claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983 alleging a violation of Deyo's Miranda rights;

2. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to ADD the following individuals as defendants in this case: (a) Officer Haas, East Hempfield Police; (b) Officer Torres, East Hempfield Police; and Corporal Tice, Manor Township Police;

3. Deyo's remaining claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for damages against defendants Eck, Tice, Haas, and Torres in the amended complaint are STAYED until such time as all related criminal proceedings in state court have been resolved in accordance with paragraph five of this order;

4. Deyo's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Warden Steberger relating to the conditions at Lancaster County Prison, and his medical care there, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Given the need to stay Deyo's other claims in this case, no amendment of the claims relating to the conditions of confinement at Lancaster County Prison and Deyo's medical care there will be permitted in this case. Instead, Deyo is GRANTED leave to reassert those claims in a new civil action. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to send Deyo a blank copy of this court's form complaint for a prisoner filing a civil rights action. Deyo may use this form to file a new civil action if he chooses to pursue his conditions-of-confinement and medical claims;

5. Deyo must notify this court within thirty (30) days of the resolution of his related criminal case, Commonwealth v. Deyo, No. CP-36-CR-4747-2022 (Lancaster Cnty. Ct. Com. Pl.) that (a) the proceedings have been resolved; (b) how the proceedings resolved; and (c) whether he still intends to pursue the remaining claims in the instant case. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case;

6. The clerk of court is DIRECTED to NOT ISSUE SUMMONSES for the defendants at this time;

7. The time to serve process under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) is hereby EXTENDED to the date the court issues summonses in this case in the event summonses are issued; and

8. The clerk of court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. Upon Deyo notifying the court that his state-court criminal proceedings have concluded, the court will reopen this case and screen Deyo's remaining claims.


Summaries of

Deyo v. Eck

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 27, 2023
Civil Action 23-1658 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Deyo v. Eck

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS FRANCIS DEYO, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP R. ECK, Manor Township…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 27, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 23-1658 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 27, 2023)