Dexcom, Inc. v. Waveform Techs., Inc.

Full title: DEXCOM, INC., Appellant v. WAVEFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 3, 2019

2018-1752 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1752 2018-1753

04-03-2019

DEXCOM, INC., Appellant v. WAVEFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee

GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID B. COCHRAN, CALVIN GRIFFITH, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA; SCOTT E. DAVIS, JOHN D. VANDENBERG, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR. SCOTT D. EADS, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by NICHOLAS (NIKA) FREMONT ALDRICH, JR., SARA KOBAK, JASON ADAM WRUBLESKI.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-01679, IPR2016-01680.

JUDGMENT

GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID B. COCHRAN, CALVIN GRIFFITH, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA; SCOTT E. DAVIS, JOHN D. VANDENBERG, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR. SCOTT D. EADS, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by NICHOLAS (NIKA) FREMONT ALDRICH, JR., SARA KOBAK, JASON ADAM WRUBLESKI. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 3, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court