Opinion
2:21-cv-01995-GMN-VCF
01-23-2023
JEFF DEWOLFE, an Individual, Plaintiff, v. IDEACOM, a Foreign Corporation, DOES I-X; ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, Defendants.
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Taylor A. Buono Sheri M. Thome, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 008657 Taylor A. Buono, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant IDeACOM HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP Jenny L. Foley, Ph.D., Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeff DeWolfe
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Taylor A. Buono Sheri M. Thome, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 008657 Taylor A. Buono, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant IDeACOM
HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP Jenny L. Foley, Ph.D., Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeff DeWolfe
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CASE TERMINATING SANCTIONS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND PLAINTIFF'S APPEARANCE AT DEPOSITION
Plaintiff, Jeff Dewolfe (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant IDEACOM, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline to file responses to the Defendant's Motion For Case Terminating Sanctions Or In The Alternative, Motion To Compel Discovery Responses And Plaintiff's Appearance At Deposition (ECF No. 27). Plaintiff's Response to the Motion was due on January 19, 2023. Plaintiff requested a one-week extension to respond to the Motion due to on-going discovery. As such, the parties stipulate for Plaintiff's response to be extended until and due on January 27, 2023.
Accordingly, this extension is made in good faith and not for the purpose of undue delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.