Summary
finding a similar claim "patently absurd" and reasoning: "the taxing of goods and services offered for sale or consumption at the city jail, without more, fails to state a violation of an inmate's federally protected constitutional rights."
Summary of this case from Ballard v. RussellOpinion
CASE NO. 2:08-cv-0111-MEF.
March 31, 2008
ORDER
On March 12, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #6) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).