From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Devonshire Surgical Facility, LLC v. Allstate Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Dec 24, 2012
38 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

No. 570727/12.

2012-12-24

DEVONSHIRE SURGICAL FACILITY, LLC, a/a/o Nancy Rodriguez, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant–Respondent.


Plaintiff, as limited by its briefs, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered March 28, 2012, which denied its cross motion for summary judgment on the complaint.
Present: SCHOENFELD, J.P., SHULMAN, HUNTER, JR., JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Order (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered March 28, 2012, affirmed, with $10 costs.

The action, seeking recovery of assigned first-party no-fault benefits, is not ripe for summary disposition. The record raises several triable issues, including whether the amounts of the timely denied claims properly reflected plaintiff's apparent status as a surgical facility or were otherwise in excess of the rates set forth in the governing fee schedule ( see MIA Acupuncture, P.C. v. Praetorian Ins. Co., 35 Misc.3d 69 [2011] ). Plaintiff waived any purported defect in the affidavit of defendant's adjuster by failing to contest its admissibility ( see Akamnonu v. Rodriguez, 12 AD3d 187 [2004] ). The new arguments raised in plaintiff's reply papers, even if properly considered ( cf. Henry v. Peguero, 72 AD3d 600, 602 [2010],appeal dismissed15 NY3d 820 [2010] ), failed to eliminate all triable issues of fact ( see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853 [1985] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Devonshire Surgical Facility, LLC v. Allstate Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Dec 24, 2012
38 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Devonshire Surgical Facility, LLC v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Devonshire Surgical Facility, LLC, a/a/o Nancy Rodriguez…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Dec 24, 2012

Citations

38 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 52351
967 N.Y.S.2d 866

Citing Cases

Lotus Acupuncture PC v. Hereford Ins. Co.

The new arguments raised in defendant's reply papers, even if properly considered (cf.Rozina v Casa 74th Dev.…

Healthy Way Acupuncture PC v. Glob. Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y.

This action, seeking recovery of assigned first-party no-fault benefits, is not ripe for summary disposition.…