From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Devine v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jun 9, 2020
18-cv-312-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 9, 2020)

Opinion

18-cv-312-bbc

06-09-2020

PATRICE DEVINE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

On October 24, 2018, I granted the parties' joint motion for remand and entered judgment in favor of plaintiff Patrice Devine under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Dkt. ##14-15. (I have revised the caption to reflect the fact that Andrew Saul is now the commissioner of Social Security.) On December 17, 2018, I accepted the parties' stipulation for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) and awarded plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $6,100. Dkt. #24. After remand, the commissioner awarded plaintiff past-due benefits back to 2014. Dkt. #25-2. Now plaintiff's counsel, Dana Duncan, has filed a motion for an attorney fee award of $7,900 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. #25. Defendant does not oppose the motion. Dkt. #27.

Counsel reports that he and plaintiff have a contingency fee agreement providing for attorney fees amounting to 25 percent of an award of past-due benefits. Dkt. #25-1. The commissioner has reserved 25 percent of the award, $15,882.75, for attorney fees. Dkt. #25-2 at 3. Counsel is requesting the full $15,882.75, with $1,882.75 from the agency, $6,100 from the EAJA award and an additional award of $7,900 from this court. He has submitted an accounting showing that he spent 26.2 attorney hours and 18.45 paralegal hours working on plaintiff's case in this court. Dkt. #25-3.

The requested fee is within the statutory cap and the parties' contingency fee agreement, but the court must review it to be sure it is reasonable in light of the character of the representation and the results obtained; the time, labor and skill required; counsel's experience, reputation and ability; and awards in similar cases. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807-09 (2002); McGuire v. Sullivan, 873 F.2d 974, 979-83 (7th Cir. 1989). Here, the requested award is reasonable. Counsel seeks a total of $14,000 in fees for the time he spent in this court. If I considered only the 26.2 hours of attorney work, counsel's hourly rate would be approximately $534. The rate is significantly lower when the paralegal time is considered as well. Counsel is an experienced attorney who represented plaintiff in this court, reviewed the administrative record and drafted a motion for summary judgment that prompted defendant to stipulate to remand. In addition, defendant does not oppose the motion. Accordingly, I will grant counsel's motion for attorney fees in the amount of $7,900 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for attorney fees filed by plaintiff's attorney, Dana Duncan, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), dkt. #25, is GRANTED. The court approves a representative fee award of $7,900 to be payable to Dana Duncan out of the statutory fee withheld from plaintiff's past-due benefits.

Entered this 9th day of June, 2020.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

BARBARA B. CRABB

District Judge


Summaries of

Devine v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Jun 9, 2020
18-cv-312-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Devine v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:PATRICE DEVINE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Date published: Jun 9, 2020

Citations

18-cv-312-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 9, 2020)