From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Devine v. Fusaro

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 12, 2021
339 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2021)

Opinion

10-12-2021

Michael DEVINE, Administrator (Estate of Timothy Devine) v. Louis FUSARO, Jr., et al.

Clare Kindall, solicitor general, and Colleen B. Valentine and Alayna M. Stone, assistant attorneys general, in support of the petition. Trent A. LaLima, Hartford, in opposition.


Clare Kindall, solicitor general, and Colleen B. Valentine and Alayna M. Stone, assistant attorneys general, in support of the petition.

Trent A. LaLima, Hartford, in opposition.

The defendants’ petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 205 Conn. App. 554, 259 A.3d 655 (AC 42164), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that, when a court determines whether sovereign immunity bars a claim against state officials or employees for actions taken in the exercise of their duties, the test set forth in Spring v. Constantino, 168 Conn. 563, 362 A.2d 871 (1975), ‘has no applicability’ when a plaintiff designates that the state officials or employees have been sued in their individual capacities?"

KELLER J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Devine v. Fusaro

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 12, 2021
339 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2021)
Case details for

Devine v. Fusaro

Case Details

Full title:Michael DEVINE, Administrator (Estate of Timothy Devine) v. Louis FUSARO…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 12, 2021

Citations

339 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2021)
260 A.3d 1224

Citing Cases

Laiuppa v. Moritz

Whether to revisit the "actual or effective notice" standard articulated in Rocco and Dorry properly is the…

Devine v. Fusaro

We granted the defendants’ petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: "Did the…