Opinion
Submitted September 27, 2000
October 23, 2000.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated November 17, 1999, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability against the defendants Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. and Prudential Securities, Inc., on the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1).
Brecher, Fishman, Pasternack, Popish, Feit, Heller, Rubin Reiff, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Lonny Levitz of counsel), for appellants.
Feder, Goldstein, Tanenbaum, D'Errico Arnedos, LLP, Carle Place, N Y (Catherine A. Asaro of counsel), for respondents .
Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of the respondents' liability under Labor Law § 240(1). There is an issue of fact as to whether the injured plaintiff refused to use safety devices that were made available to him thereby rendering him a "recalcitrant worker" (see, Jastrzebski v. North Shore School Dist., 223 A.D.2d 677, affd 88 N.Y.2d 946; see generally, Gordon v. Eastern Ry. Supply., 82 N.Y.2d 555, 562-563; Stolt v. General Foods Corp., 81 N.Y.2d 918).