From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Devices v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 6, 2010
No. C 08-00986 SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2010)

Opinion

No. C 08-00986 SI.

April 6, 2010


ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG'S REQUEST TO ALLOW DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM TRIGGS


On March 24, 2010, the Court issued an order directing the parties to further meet and confer regarding Samsung's request to allow the deposition of William Triggs. The parties were unable to come to an agreement during the meet and confer, and Samsung has renewed its motion. The Court now grants Samsung's request.

There is no dispute that Samsung served the deposition subpoena on Mr. Triggs several weeks prior to the fact discovery deadline of March 5, 2010, and that the deposition did not occur before the close of discovery because the witness was unavailable. The Court recognizes the importance of adhering to the discovery schedule, but does not wish to penalize Samsung simply because the witness was not available before the deadline.

Samsung's request to allow the deposition of Mr. Triggs is GRANTED. The parties shall schedule the deposition at their convenience, but in any event no later than April 23, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Devices v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 6, 2010
No. C 08-00986 SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Devices v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, et al., Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants, v. SAMSUNG…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 6, 2010

Citations

No. C 08-00986 SI (N.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2010)