From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Devereaux v. Clifford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1896
11 App. Div. 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

December Term, 1896.

James F. Swanick, for the appellant.

Nash Rockwood, for the respondents.


The conviction for contempt was proper, but, in the absence of evidence that the defendant's disobedience occasioned any actual loss or injury to the plaintiff, beyond the costs and expenses of this proceeding to punish him, the fine to the amount of the judgment was not authorized. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2284; Fall Brook Coal Co. v. Hecksher, 42 Hun, 534.)

The order should be affirmed as to the conviction, reversed as to the fine, and the proceeding remitted to the Special Term, as in the case cited, for further order in respect to the fine, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant.

All concurred.

Order affirmed as to conviction, reversed as to the fine, and the proceedings remitted to the Special Term for further action, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal to the appellant.


Summaries of

Devereaux v. Clifford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 1, 1896
11 App. Div. 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for

Devereaux v. Clifford

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES J. DEVEREAUX and ISAAC H. MESERVE, Respondents, v . TIMOTHY A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1896

Citations

11 App. Div. 401 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
42 N.Y.S. 687