From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Development v. Elaine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1574 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. CA 07-01881.

April 25, 2008.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered June 12, 2007 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment granted the petition.

E. THOMAS JONES, TOWN ATTORNEY, WILLIAMSVILLE (ALAN P. MC CRACKEN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

HARRIS BEACH PLLC, BUFFALO (RICHARD T. SULLIVAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Present: Smith, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Pine and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Respondents appeal from a judgment that granted the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding. We agree with respondents, as asserted in their second affirmative defense, that the petition must be dismissed because petitioner failed to exhaust its administrative remedies ( see Matter of Camardo v Michelman, 12 AD3d 1176; see also Matter of Hays v Walrath, 271 AD2d 744, 745; cf. Matter of Social Spirits v Town of Colonie, 74 AD2d 933). We therefore reverse the judgment and dismiss the petition.


Summaries of

Development v. Elaine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1574 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Development v. Elaine

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of C L F DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Respondent, v. ELAINE M. WEISS et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 25, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 1574 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3855
855 N.Y.S.2d 392

Citing Cases

Ferraro v. Town Bd.

There can be no doubt that in order to obtain review pursuant to Article 78 of the CPLR, petitioners must…