Development Co. v. Brannan

1 Citing case

  1. Feeney v. State

    714 P.2d 1229 (Wyo. 1986)   Cited 6 times
    Stating the trial judge is able to “sift the wheat from the chaff”

    Herman v. Speed King Manufacturing Company, Wyo., 675 P.2d 1271, 1279 (1984). See also In Re Shreve, Wyo., 432 P.2d 271 at 273 (1967); Arnold v. Jennings, 75 Wyo. 463, 296 P.2d 989 (1956); Macy v. Billings, 74 Wyo. 404, 289 P.2d 422 (1955); Miracle v. Barker, 59 Wyo. 92, 136 P.2d 678 (1943); Alaska Development Co. v. Brannan, 40 Wyo. 106, 275 P. 115 (1929). On appeal it is presumed, in cases tried by a court without a jury, that the court in reaching its decision disregarded improperly admitted evidence unless the record affirmatively shows that the trial court's decision was influenced by improperly admitted evidence.