From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dev v. Donahoe

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 4, 2013
2:12-cv-3026-TLN-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2013)

Opinion


LAL DEV, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, AND DOES 1-15 INCLUSIVE, Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-3026-TLN-EFB PS United States District Court, E.D. California. September 4, 2013

          ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 4, 2013, the court heard defendant's motion to compel plaintiff's attendance at his deposition. ECF No. 11. Attorney Edward Olsen appeared at the hearing on behalf of defendant; plaintiff appeared pro se. As stated on the record, and for the reasons stated on the record, defendant's motion is granted. Each party shall bear its own costs.

         Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

         1. Defendant's motion to compel plaintiff's attendance at his deposition (ECF No. 11) is granted; and

         2. Plaintiff is to appear at his deposition on September 6, 2013 at 10:00 a.m at the United States Attorney's Office, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

         SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dev v. Donahoe

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 4, 2013
2:12-cv-3026-TLN-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Dev v. Donahoe

Case Details

Full title:LAL DEV, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 4, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-3026-TLN-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2013)