From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dev v. Donahoe

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2013
2:11-cv-2950-JAM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)

Opinion


LAL DEV, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Defendant. No. 2:11-cv-2950-JAM-EFB PS United States District Court, E.D. California. September 5, 2013

          ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         On July 11, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

         The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

         1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 11, 2013, are ADOPTED; and

         2. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, ECF No. 116, is denied.


Summaries of

Dev v. Donahoe

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 5, 2013
2:11-cv-2950-JAM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Dev v. Donahoe

Case Details

Full title:LAL DEV, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 5, 2013

Citations

2:11-cv-2950-JAM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2013)