From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 16, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-06605-WHO (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-06605-WHO

12-16-2016

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DIANE TAYLOR, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 5, 9, 10

The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge James's Report and Recommendation that this case be remanded to Alameda County Superior Court and that Defendant's In Forma Pauperis Application be denied as moot. Dkt. No. 5. The time to file objections has passed and no objections have been filed. The court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in full, except that this court GRANTS Defendant's In Forma Pauperis Application. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED to Alameda County Superior Court. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Request for Judicial Notice are denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 16, 2016

/s/_________

WILLIAM H. ORRICK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 16, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-06605-WHO (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DIANE TAYLOR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 16, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-06605-WHO (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2016)

Citing Cases

SS Invs. v. Haten

For example, United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently found a defendant…

Cam IX Tr. v. Beddell

For example, United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently found a defendant…