From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. N. Am. Title Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Mar 18, 2020
2:22-cv-00547-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Mar. 18, 2020)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00547-GMN-BNW

03-18-2020

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2006-NC5, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-NC5 Plaintiff, v. NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. and ROE CORPORATIONS XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants.

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Yanxiong Li, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-NC5, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC5 SINCLAIR BRAUN KARGHER LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant, Doma Title Insurance F/K/A North American Title Insurance Company, Inc.


WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Yanxiong Li, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-NC5, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC5

SINCLAIR BRAUN KARGHER LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant, Doma Title Insurance F/K/A North American Title Insurance Company, Inc.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 41] (FIRST REQUEST)

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-NC5, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC5 (“Deutsche Bank”) and Defendant Doma Title Insurance F/K/A North American Title Insurance Company (“NATIC”, collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsels, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On March 5, 2024, NATIC filed a Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 41];

2. Deutsche Bank's deadline to respond to NATIC's Motion to Dismiss is currently March 19, 2024;

3. Deutsche Bank's counsel is requesting a brief two-week extension until April 2, 2024, to provide additional time for counsel to review and respond to the points and authorities cited to in the pending Motion;

4. Counsel for NATIC does not oppose the requested extension;

5. This is the first request for an extension and is made in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay or prejudice.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. N. Am. Title Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Mar 18, 2020
2:22-cv-00547-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Mar. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. N. Am. Title Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Mar 18, 2020

Citations

2:22-cv-00547-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Mar. 18, 2020)