Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Luna

2 Citing cases

  1. Hui Jun Lin v. Clark

    666 S.W.3d 270 (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)   Cited 6 times

    "In order to comply with the rules of appellate procedure in Rule 84.04, a point on appeal must proceed under one of the Murphy v. Carron grounds, each of which requires a distinct analytical framework." Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. as Tr. for Am. Home Mtg. Inv. Tr. 2006-3 v. Luna , 655 S.W.3d 820, 826 n.3 (Mo. App. W.D. 2022) (internal quotation marks omitted). "If a point on appeal fails to identify which one of the Murphy v. Carron grounds applies, Rule 84.04 directs us to dismiss the point."

  2. Wax v. Vickers

    No. SD38370 (Mo. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2024)

    These facts might entitle Defendant to have the deed reformed. See Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. as Tr. for Am. Home Mortg. Inv. Tr. 2006-3 v. Luna, 655 S.W.3d 820, 827 (Mo. App. 2022). The trial court also could reasonably infer that Plaintiff knew Defendant's name was not on the deed, but she and Husband voluntarily placed Defendant in possession of the Property anyway. Defendant remained in possession and made the monthly Note payments until a "family tiff" occurred, and she was told to vacate the Property.