From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Hawthorne

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Dec 22, 2022
No. CAAP-22-0000355 (Haw. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2022)

Opinion

CAAP-22-0000355

12-22-2022

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2006 SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLES LLC TRUST 2006-FR4, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LORI J. HAWTHORNE, fka LORI J. BAUER, aka LORI S. BAUER, Defendant-Appellee, and LANI PACIFIC, Defendant-Appellant, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants LANI PACIFIC, a registered business entity, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2006 SECURITIZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLES LLC TRUST 2006-FR4, Defendant-Appellee, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants


NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CIVIL NOS. 3CC19100014K and 3CCV-20-0000212

Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Chan, JJ.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Upon review of the record, it appears that we lack appellate jurisdiction over self-represented Defendant-Appellant Lani Pacific's (Lani Pacific) appeal from the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit's (Circuit Court) April 22, 2022 "Order Denying Defendant Lani Pacific's Emergency Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Injunction Filed April 11, 2022" (Denial Order) because the Circuit Court has not entered a final, appealable order or judgment. See Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016); Hawai'i Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 54(b), 58; Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai'i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994) .

Further, the Denial Order is not independently appealable under the collateral-order doctrine, the Forgay doctrine, or HRS § 641-1(b). See Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawai'i 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016) (setting forth the requirements for appealability under the collateral-order doctrine and the Forgay doctrine); HRS § 641-1(b) (specifying requirements for leave to file interlocutory appeal); see also Freddy Nobriga Enter., Inc. v. State Dep't of Hawaiian Home Lands, No. 27358, 2005 WL 2334381, at *1 (Haw. Sept. 22, 2005) (Order Dismissing Appeal).

Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed.


Summaries of

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Hawthorne

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Dec 22, 2022
No. CAAP-22-0000355 (Haw. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Hawthorne

Case Details

Full title:DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE POOLING AND…

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii

Date published: Dec 22, 2022

Citations

No. CAAP-22-0000355 (Haw. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2022)