Opinion
2:21-CV-01854-CDS-DJA
04-26-2022
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants.
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216 Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365 EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277 SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Attorneys for Defendants FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC., CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, and TICOR TITLE OF NEVADA, INC. DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b) Gary L. Compton, State Bar No. 1652 LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216 Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365 EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP
Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277 SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Attorneys for Defendants FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC., CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, and TICOR TITLE OF NEVADA, INC.
DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b) Gary L. Compton, State Bar No. 1652
LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
STIPULATION AND TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (ECF No. 1) FOURTH REQUEST
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
COMES NOW defendants Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. (“FNTG”), Chicago Title Insurance Company (“Chicago Title”) and Ticor Title of Nevada, Inc. (“Ticor Agency”) (collectively “Defendants”) and plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, which hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On October 6, 2021 Deutsche Bank filed its complaint in the Eighth Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada;
2. On October 6, 2021, Chicago Title removed the instant case to the United States District Court for the State of Nevada (ECF No. 1);
3. On January 19, 2022, the parties submitted the first stipulation for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Deutsche Bank's complaint, which was granted by the Court on January 20, 2022 (ECF No. 24);
4. On February 23, 2022 the parties submitted the second stipulation for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Deutsche Bank's complaint, which was granted by the Court on February 24, 2022 (ECF No. 26);
5. On March 21, 2022, the parties submitted the third stipulation for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Deutsche Bank's complaint, which was granted by the Court on March 22, 2022 (ECF No. 28);
6. Counsel for Defendants request a further two-week extension for Defendants to file their respective responses to Deutsche Bank's complaint, through and including Monday, May 9, 2022, to afford Defendants' counsel additional time to review and respond to Deutsche Bank's complaint.
7. Counsel for Deutsche Bank does not oppose the requested extension;
8. This is the fourth request for an extension made by counsel for Defendants, which is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
9. This stipulation is entered into without waiving any of Defendants' objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12.
IT IS SO STIPULATED that Defendants' respective deadlines to respond to the complaint are hereby extended through and including Monday, May 9, 2022.
Dated: April 25, 2022
IT IS SO ORDERED.