Opinion
3:19-CV-00649-RCJ-CLB
02-17-2023
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.
Scott E. Gizer, Esq. Sophia S. Lau, Esq. EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP Janet Trost, Esq. SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP KEVIN S. SINCLAIR Attorneys for Defendants CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
Scott E. Gizer, Esq.
Sophia S. Lau, Esq.
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP
Janet Trost, Esq.
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP
KEVIN S. SINCLAIR Attorneys for Defendants
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING DEADLINE TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
SECOND REQUEST
ROBERT C. JONES, UNITED STAIRS DISTRICT JUDGE
COMES NOW defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (“Chicago Title”) and plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, which hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On October 11, 2022 Deutsche Bank filed its First Amended Complaint in this action (ECF No. 27);
2. On November 10, 2022 Chicago Title moved to dismiss Deutsche Bank's complaint (ECF No. 28);
3. On January 11, 2023 Deutsche Bank opposed Chicago Title's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 47) and filed a countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 48);
4. On January 19, 2023, the Court granted the parties' first stipulation to extend the time for Chicago Title to file its reply and opposition, such that both are currently due on February 17, 2023 (ECF No. 50);
5. Counsel for Chicago Title requests a 14-day extension to reply in support of its motion to dismiss and oppose the countermotion, such that Chicago Title's reply in support of motion to dismiss and opposition to the countermotion are both due on March 3, 2023, to afford Chicago Title additional time to review and respond to the arguments advanced by Deutsche Bank.
6. Counsel for Deutsche Bank does not oppose the requested extension;
7. This is the second request for an extension made by counsel for Chicago Title, which is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
8. This stipulation is entered into without waiving any of Chicago Title's objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12.
IT IS SO STIPULATED that Chicago Title's deadline to file its reply in support of its motion to dismiss and to oppose Deutsche Bank's countermotion for partial summary judgment is hereby extended through and including Friday, March 3, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.