From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deubell v. Forks Fire District Number Three

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 12, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In this Dram Shop case, the moving defendants failed to establish a prima facie defense sufficient to warrant judgment as a matter of law, and the burden never shifted to plaintiff to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 N.Y.2d 851).


Summaries of

Deubell v. Forks Fire District Number Three

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Deubell v. Forks Fire District Number Three

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH L. DEUBELL, as Administrator of the Estate of JACQUELINE A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 788

Citing Cases

Chemsol, LLC v. City of Sibley

The inclusion of this language distinguishes the Sibley odor ordinance from the three cases cited in support…

Indep. Ins. Agents & Brokers of N.Y., Inc. v. N.Y. State Dep't of Fin. Servs.

Respondents concede that, in an effort to mitigate the costs of implementation, they intentionally did not…