From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Destin v. New York City Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-10245

Submitted February 5, 2003.

March 31, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated September 10, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Wallace D. Gossett (Steve S. Efron, New York, N.Y. [Renee L. Cyr] of counsel), for appellant.

Litman Litman, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Jeffrey R. Litman of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

Norman Volk Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Michael I. Josephs and Holly E. Peck of counsel), for defendant-respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant New York City Transit Authority for summary judgment. Discovery is still outstanding. Thus, it would be premature to grant summary judgment at this stage of the proceedings (see CPLR 3212[f]; Rajan v. Insler, 300 A.D.2d 463; AIT Intl. v. Federal Express Corp., 278 A.D.2d 439, 440).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Destin v. New York City Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Destin v. New York City Transit Auth

Case Details

Full title:MARIE MICHELLE DESTIN, plaintiff-respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 864

Citing Cases

Grande v. Peteroy

ORDERED that the cross motions are granted to the extent that reargument is granted, and upon reargument,…