From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Desrosiers v. Hartford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-02057-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-02057-MCE-GGH

09-22-2011

LINDA K. DESROSIERS, Plaintiff, v. THE HARTFORD aka HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO., HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants.

JACKSON LEWIS LLP ROBERT J. SCHNACK JERRY J. DESCHLER, JR. Attorneys for Defendants THE HARTFORD aka HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. and HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. CHRISTOPHER H. WHELAN, INC. CHRISTOPHER H. WHELAN Attorneys for Plaintiff LINDA K. DESROSIERS


JACKSON LEWIS LLP

ROBERT J. SCHNACK (SBN 191987)

JERRY J. DESCHLER JR. (SBN 215691)

Attorneys for Defendants

THE HARTFORD aka HARTFORD FIRE

INS. CO. and HARTFORD FINANCIAL

SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Christopher H. Whelan, Esq. (SBN 080823)

CHRISTOPHER H. WHELAN, INC.

Attorney for Plaintiff

LINDA K. DESROSIERS

STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO EXTEND

DISCOVERY CUT-OFF AND MOTION HEARING DEADLINE; ORDER THEREON

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4), and for good cause shown, Plaintiff Linda K. Desrosiers ("Plaintiff") and Defendants THE HARTFORD aka HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. and HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. (collectively hereinafter "Defendants"), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and jointly request that the Court vacate the present discovery cut-off date of October 7, 2011, related discovery deadlines in paragraph IV of this Court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling Order) dated November 30, 2009, and the deadline for hearing dispositive motions, and that the Court further continue such dates by approximately 60-90 days to allow for mediation as set forth below. The requested continuances will have no impact on the final pre-trial conference and trial dates in paragraphs VII and VIII of the Pretrial Scheduling Order. THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS the parties initially agreed to defer discovery due to Plaintiff's counsel's impacted trial schedule, and counsel for the Parties have since diligently engaged in discovery in a cooperative manner. To date, the parties have exchanged written discovery and over 1,000 pages of documentary evidence and have taken five depositions of key witnesses, including a full day of Plaintiff's deposition. Due to the complex legal and factual nature of the case, counsel for the parties have agreed that Defendant may depose Plaintiff for up to an additional 3.5 hours beyond the 7 hour limit in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d). The parties have stipulated to participate in private mediation, but must schedule the mediation around Plaintiff's counsel's trial schedule, which includes 4-week trial scheduled to begin September 19, 2011. Consequently, the parties agree that, in the interest of increasingly the likelihood of successful mediation, further discovery, including completing the depositions of Plaintiff and her treating physicians, should be deferred until after mediation. Consequently, good cause exists for continuing the discovery deadlines set forth in the Orders as follows:

(1) The deadline of October 7, 2011 to complete all non-expert discovery shall be vacated and continued to January 7, 2012.
(2) The deadline of December 7, 2011 to disclose experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) shall be vacated and continued to February 7, 2012;
(3) The deadline of December 27, 2011 to disclose experts and produce reports for expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) shall be vacated and continued March 7, 2012; and
(4) The deadline of February 7, 2012 to have dispositive motions heard shall be vacated and continued to April 10, 2012.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

By: ROBERT J. SCHNACK

JERRY J. DESCHLER, JR.

Attorneys for Defendants

THE HARTFORD aka HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. and

HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.

CHRISTOPHER H. WHELAN, INC.

By: CHRISTOPHER H. WHELAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LINDA K. DESROSIERS

Having reviewed the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

(1) The deadline of October 7, 2011 to complete all non-expert discovery shall be vacated and continued to January 7, 2012.
(2) The deadline of December 7, 2011 to disclose experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) shall be vacated and continued to February 7, 2012;
(3) The deadline of December 27, 2011 to disclose experts and produce reports for expert testimony intended solely for rebuttal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) shall be vacated and continued March 7, 2012; and
(4) The deadline of February 7, 2012 to have dispositive motions heard shall be vacated and continued to April 10, 2012.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Desrosiers v. Hartford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-02057-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Desrosiers v. Hartford

Case Details

Full title:LINDA K. DESROSIERS, Plaintiff, v. THE HARTFORD aka HARTFORD FIRE INS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-02057-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)