From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Desper v. Ponton

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2013
521 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6211

05-29-2013

JAMIE PAUL DESPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. H. J. PONTON, Warden; MR. ROGERS, Corporal; MR. DESAINTES, a/k/a DeSaints, Correctional Officer; MS. EVANS, Counselor, Defendants - Appellees, and, MR. GERST, Head Counselor; MS. SYLVIA WHITTEN, Facility Ombudsman; MS. ANITA BRYANT, Regional Ombudsman; MR. WOODS, Correctional Officer; MR. LOUIS CEI, Special Programs Manager, Defendants.

Jamie Paul Desper, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00670-AJT-IDD) Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamie Paul Desper, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jamie Paul Desper appeals the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider its order entering summary judgment against his civil rights action, which proceeded under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Sossamon v. Texas, 131 S. Ct. 1651, 1663 (2011); Rendelman v. Rouse, 569 F.3d 182, 186, 189 (4th Cir. 2009). See also Lovelace v. Lee, 472 F.3d 174, 187 (4th Cir. 2006); In re Long Term Admin. Segregation of Inmates Designated as Five Percenters, 174 F.3d 464, 468-69 (4th Cir. 1999).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Desper v. Ponton

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 29, 2013
521 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Desper v. Ponton

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE PAUL DESPER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. H. J. PONTON, Warden; MR…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 29, 2013

Citations

521 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2013)