From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Desouza v. White Castle, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2012
Case No. 12-10566 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-10566

10-31-2012

MICHELLE DESOUZA, Plaintiff, v. WHITE CASTLE, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS

ROLANDA TAYLOR AND PATRICE BROWN

Nothing on the docket in this action shows that Defendants Rolanda Taylor or Patrice Brown received service. The time to serve Taylor or Brown long ago expired. A September 20, 2012, order directed Plaintiff to show cause by September 28, 2012, why the action against Taylor and against Brown should not suffer dismissal without prejudice. Plaintiff submits no response. Accordingly,

Although the show cause order issued on September 20, Plaintiff was told at a status conference on September 12 that she needed promptly to submit a paper arguing against the dismissal of Taylor and Brown. Also, nearly a month has passed since the September 28 deadline.

IT IS ORDERED that the action against Rolanda Taylor and the action against Patrice Brown are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

____________________

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, October 31, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522


Summaries of

Desouza v. White Castle, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2012
Case No. 12-10566 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Desouza v. White Castle, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE DESOUZA, Plaintiff, v. WHITE CASTLE, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-10566 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2012)