From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Desocio v. Fifth Avenue Fifty Ninth Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 1999
262 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 8, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.).


Plaintiffs' motion to vacate their default in responding to defendants' summary judgment motion was properly denied in light of plaintiffs' failure to make the requisite demonstration that their action possessed merit ( see, M.D. Son Contr. v. American Props., 179 A.D.2d 519). Particularly noteworthy in this regard was the circumstance that plaintiff's deposition testimony as to the manner in which his accident occurred contradicted his pleadings.

Concur — Williams, J.P., Wallach, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.


Summaries of

Desocio v. Fifth Avenue Fifty Ninth Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 1999
262 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Desocio v. Fifth Avenue Fifty Ninth Corp.

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS DESOCIO et al., Appellants, v. FIFTH AVENUE FIFTY NINTH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 8, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 636

Citing Cases

Aleria v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

Although the officer's report stated that the lighting was not adequate, the pleadings do not mention the…