From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Desmond v. For-Med

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 2007
42 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-10000.

July 31, 2007.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), dated August 4, 2006, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate a stipulation of settlement dated May 30, 2002.

Ciarelli Dempsey, Riverhead, N.Y. (John L. Ciarelli of counsel), for appellant.

Emanuel R. Gold, Forest Hills, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Miller, J.P., Mastro, Lifson and Carni, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate a stipulation of settlement dated May 30, 2002 ( see Pretterhofer v Pretterhofer), 37 AD3d 446). There is no evidence that the defendant engaged in, among other things, any fraud as to the stipulation ( id.). To the contrary, the confusion and delay in this case appears to have arisen from the plaintiff's failure to have taken a clear and consistent position concerning the money at issue, and failure to provide the defendant with relevant information concerning the same.


Summaries of

Desmond v. For-Med

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 2007
42 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Desmond v. For-Med

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD W. DESMOND, Appellant, v. FOR-MED MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 31, 2007

Citations

42 A.D.3d 559 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6270
841 N.Y.S.2d 593

Citing Cases

In re the Serpico

In any event, we note, in the interest of judicial economy, that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief…