From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deskins v. Brandon

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 30, 2007
Case No. 3:06-1014 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-1014.

November 30, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation ("R R") (Docket Entry No. 13) in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that Petitioner's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied; this action be dismissed; and a Certificate of Appealability not issue. The R R was issued on May 24, 2007, and Petitioner has filed no objections thereto, even though he was specifically instructed about his opportunity to do so (Docket Entry No. 13 at 15).

This Court has thoroughly reviewed Petitioner's Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Respondent's Answer, the state court record, and the R R. The Court finds the Magistrate Judge properly concluded Petitioner's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are without merit. The Court further finds that reasonable jurists would not find this conclusion debatable.

Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:

(1) The Report and Recommendation, Docket Entry No. 13, is hereby ACCEPTED;

(2) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

(3) A Certificate of Appealability will not issue because Petitioner cannot demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the Court's assessment of his ineffective assistance of counsel claims debatable or wrong.

Entry of this Order shall constitute the judgment in this case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a).

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Deskins v. Brandon

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 30, 2007
Case No. 3:06-1014 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Deskins v. Brandon

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN DESKINS, Petitioner, v. WAYNE BRANDON, WARDEN, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:06-1014 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2007)

Citing Cases

Deskins v. Johnson

In his original § 2254 petition, Deskins asserted four claims for relief: "1) defense counsel should have…