Id. (citing Clouse v. Garfinkle, 231 S.W.2d 345, 348 (Tenn. 1950)); see Design Concept Corp. v. Phelps, No. E1999-00259-COA-R9-CV, 2000 WL 2000 WL 782063, at *8 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 20, 2000). While private condemnation will not be granted based on mere convenience, it will not be withheld simply because the party who seeks condemnation has, or may obtain, another outlet which is not adequate and convenient.