Summary
rejecting plaintiff's argument that his release of employer from discrimination and retaliation claims warranted more consideration than the standard severance payment of two weeks' salary that he received, and stating that “courts do not generally inquire into the adequacy of consideration in determining whether a contract has been formed”
Summary of this case from Anderson v. Xerox Corp.Opinion
CASE NUMBER: CV-11-187-EFS
01-31-2012
SHAWN LAWRENCE DESAUTEL, Plaintiff, v. TETRA TECH EC, INC., Defendant.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
[] Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
[X] Decision by Court. This action came to hearing before the Court. The issues have been heard and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered with prejudice in favor of Tetra Tech Ec, Inc.
JAMES R. LARSEN
Clerk
Renea Ferrante
(By) Deputy Clerk
Renea Ferrante