From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Derryberry v. Solano Cnty. Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1727 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1727 KJN P

09-12-2011

MICHAEL DERRYBERRY, Plaintiff, v. SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Dkt. No. 3.) By order filed August 5, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Derryberry v. Solano Cnty. Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1727 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Derryberry v. Solano Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DERRYBERRY, Plaintiff, v. SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1727 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)