From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deriggi v. Brady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 2009
68 A.D.3d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 1703 1703A 104300/07.

December 8, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered April 1, 2009, which granted plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike defendants' answer and counterclaims, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered July 2, 2009, which, to the extent appealable, denied defendants' motion to renew or to vacate the April 1 order, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

David E. Frazer, New York, for appellants.

Abraham, Lerner Arnold, LLP, New York (Frank P. Winston of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


Defendants' unexplained failure to comply with several disclosure orders, the last of which explicitly advised that defendants' answer would be struck if compliance were not forthcoming, was willful and contumacious and warranted the extreme sanction of striking of their answer ( see Zletz v Wetanson, 67 NY2d 711; Helms v Gangemi, 265 AD2d 203, 204). We have considered defendants' other contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Deriggi v. Brady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 2009
68 A.D.3d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Deriggi v. Brady

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH DERIGGI, Respondent, v. EDWARD BRADY et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9085
888 N.Y.S.2d 891