Opinion
3:21-cv-1030-HL
12-30-2022
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, United States District Judge
Magistrate Judge Hallman issued a Findings and Recommendation on November 14, 2022, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendants Shah and Weigand's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim without prejudice, deny Defendants Wellpath and Ronan's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and deny Defendant Weigand's motion to dismiss based on untimely service. F&R, ECF 56. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hallman's Findings and Recommendation [56]. Accordingly, Defendants Wellpath and Ronan's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [44] is DENIED. Defendant Weigand's motion to dismiss for untimely service [44] is DENIED. Defendants Shah and Weigand's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [44] is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.