Depuy Synthes Products, LLC v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Full title: DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, LLC, Appellant, v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Appellee.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 14, 2015

589 F. App'x 1001 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-1136

01-14-2015

DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, LLC, Appellant, v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Appellee.

PAUL J. CRONIN, Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were HEATHER B. REPICKY and LISA J. ADAMS. JOSEPH R. RE, Knobbe, Martens, Olson, & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were CHRISTY G. LEA; BRADLEY T. LENNIE, Hunton & Williams, LLP, of Washington DC; and ROBERT A. KING and DAVID A. KELLY, of Atlanta, Georgia.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 90/009,378, 95/000,468.

JUDGMENT

PAUL J. CRONIN, Nutter, McClennen & Fish, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were HEATHER B. REPICKY and LISA J. ADAMS. JOSEPH R. RE, Knobbe, Martens, Olson, & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were CHRISTY G. LEA; BRADLEY T. LENNIE, Hunton & Williams, LLP, of Washington DC; and ROBERT A. KING and DAVID A. KELLY, of Atlanta, Georgia. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 14, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court