It is well established that defense counsel's objection to one question on a specific ground does not necessarily equate to an objection to another related question later. See, e.g., Dept. of Social Services v. Freeman , 197 Conn. App. 281, 296, 232 A.3d 27 ("[a]n objection to a question on a specific ground is not an objection to a similar question later" (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 335 Conn. 922, 233 A.3d 1090 (2020). Thus, the trial court was never presented with and never ruled on the claim regarding the prosecutor's questions to Flockhart about the general behavior of drug dealers that the defendant now raises on appeal.

Joan M. Andrews, assistant attorney general, in opposition.The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 197 Conn. App. 281, 232 A.3d 27 (2020), is denied.

We therefore reject any suggestion by the defendants that their objections encompassed exhibit 20. See Dept. of Social Services v. Freeman , 197 Conn. App. 281, 296, 232 A.3d 27 ("[i]n order to preserve an evidentiary ruling for review, trial counsel must object properly"), cert. denied, 335 Conn. 922, 233 A.3d 1090 (2020).

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dept. of Social Services v. Freeman , 197 Conn. App. 281, 289–90, 232 A.3d 27, cert. denied, 335 Conn. 922, 233 A.3d 1090 (2020). "Under [an abuse of discretion] standard, we must make every reasonable presumption in favor of upholding the trial court's ruling, and only upset it for a manifest abuse of discretion. ...