From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dept. of Law Public Safety v. Merlino

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 20, 1988
109 N.J. 134 (N.J. 1988)

Opinion

Argued December 1, 1987 —

Decided January 20, 1988.

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 216 N.J. Super. 579 (1987).

Peter L. Bruso argued the cause for appellant, Philip Leonetti ( Jacobs, Todd Bruso, attorneys; Edwin J. Jacobs, Jr., of counsel; Edwin J. Jacobs, Jr., and Rosemary A. Cain, on the briefs).

Michael L. Testa argued the cause for appellant, Lawrence Merlino ( Basile, Testa Testa, attorneys).

Gary A. Ehrlich, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Gary A. Ehrlich and Anthony J. Parrillo, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Dennis Daly, Senior Assistant Counsel, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Casino Control Commission ( Robert J. Genatt, General Counsel, attorney; Dennis Daly and Carole R. Jacobson, Assistant Counsel, on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 216 N.J. Super. 579.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Dept. of Law Public Safety v. Merlino

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 20, 1988
109 N.J. 134 (N.J. 1988)
Case details for

Dept. of Law Public Safety v. Merlino

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 20, 1988

Citations

109 N.J. 134 (N.J. 1988)
535 A.2d 968

Citing Cases

Singer v. Cozzino

State v. Merlino, 216 N.J. Super. 579, 587 (App. Div. 1987) (emphasis added), aff'd, 109 N.J. 134 (1988). The…

Schechter v. New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety

N.J.S.A. 5:12-71e to i. A person who the Division petitions the Commission to exclude may demand a hearing at…