Opinion
A183757
08-28-2024
Aron Perez-Selsky filed the brief for appellant. Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
Submitted July 12, 2024
Washington County Circuit Court 21JU05036; Michele C. Rini, Judge.
Aron Perez-Selsky filed the brief for appellant.
Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
Affirmed.
EGAN, J.
Father appeals a permanency judgment regarding one of his children, dated December 12, 2023, which continued the current plan of adoption for the child, and which continued the child in the legal custody of the Department of Human Services for care, placement, and supervision. The court terminated father's parental rights in October 2023. Father's appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or. 434, 814 P.2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or.App. 563, 484 P.3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v. Nooth, 254 Or.App. 402, 295 P.3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or. 747 (2013) (same).
Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour brief, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.