Opinion
No. 94-742
Submitted June 15, 1994 —
Decided July 27, 1994.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Medina County, No. 2220-M.
Laybourne, Smith, Gore Goldsmith, A. Russell Smith, Robert B. Laybourne and Joy S. Wagner, for appellants.
Buckingham, Doolittle Burroughs Co., L.P.A., and David W. Hilkert, for appellee.
The motion to certify the record is allowed, the judgment on appeal is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504.
A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.
MOYER, C.J., concurs separately.
WRIGHT, J., dissents.
I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504, stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry.