From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Depasquale v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 28, 2012
3:11-cv-00191-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00191-LRH-WGC

11-28-2012

VINCENT DEPASQUALE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#63) entered on September 18, 2012, recommending granting Defendant Robertson's Motion to Dismiss (#46) filed on July 6, 2012, and dismissing Defendant Robertson without prejudice. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#63) entered on September 18, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#63) entered on September 18, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant Robertson's Motion to Dismiss (#46) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Robertson is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Depasquale v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 28, 2012
3:11-cv-00191-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Depasquale v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT DEPASQUALE, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00191-LRH-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2012)

Citing Cases

Hamer v. Nevada

Plaintiff has never moved the Court to serve the governor or attorney general and has repeatedly neglected to…