From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Deocampo v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 25, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3076 EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3076 EFB.

August 25, 2011


ORDER


Defendant has filed an answer and administrative transcript. Under the court's previous order, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was to be filed on August 12, 2011.

Defendant has filed a status report which states plaintiff's counsel of record in the instant action died in May 2011. No substitution of counsel has yet been filed in the instant matter.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The case is stayed for forty-five days to allow plaintiff to find a new attorney.

2. Within forty-five days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a substitution of attorney. If no substitution of attorney is filed, plaintiff shall proceed in this action pro se.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff Jason E. DeOcampo, 401 Henry Street, Vallejo, CA 94590; and Robert C. Weems (SBN 148156), 769 Center Blvd. PMB 38, Fairfax, CA 94930; rcweems@weemslawoffices.com; phone: (415) 881-7653; fax: (866) 610-1430.

4. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment shall be filed within ninety days from the date of this order.


Summaries of

Deocampo v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 25, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3076 EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Deocampo v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JASON E. DEOCAMPO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3076 EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)