Dentons U.S. LLP v. Zhang

1 Citing case

  1. LifeVoxel.AI Inc. v. Mamillapalli

    3:23-CV-00534 (SVN) (D. Conn. Mar. 29, 2024)

    Pacelli v. Augustus Intel., Inc., 459 F.Supp.3d 597, 617-18 (S.D.N.Y. 2020); see also Willis Re Inc. v. Herriott, 550 F.Supp.3d 68, 90-91 (S.D.N.Y. 2021) (finding that, if New York law applied to contract, section 925 would “not come into the picture at all”); Dentons U.S. LLP v. Zhang, 211 A.D.3d 631, 632 (N.Y.App.Div. 2022) (finding that issue of applicability of section 925 to agreement which stipulated New York or Chicago for the arbitration location had been delegated to arbitrator). Pacelli followed the holdings in two California cases, which came to the same conclusion.