From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dentes v. Wetherell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 8, 1988
139 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

April 8, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff, in accordance with the following memorandum: In the absence of prejudice to defendant, plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his complaint should have been granted (see, Newton v. Aqua Flo Co., 106 A.D.2d 919). Two of the causes of action plaintiff seeks to add to his amended complaint, however, are patently insufficient and plaintiff should not be permitted to add them (see, De Forte v. Allstate Ins. Co., 66 A.D.2d 1028). The order appealed from is modified, therefore, by granting plaintiff's motion to serve the proposed amended complaint after deleting the second and third causes of action for infliction of extreme emotional distress.


Summaries of

Dentes v. Wetherell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 8, 1988
139 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Dentes v. Wetherell

Case Details

Full title:EVAN M. DENTES, Individually and as Officer and Director of Evan M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1988

Citations

139 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Reno v. Wheatland-Chili Cent. Sch. Dist.

Memorandum: Defendant-appellant (defendant) appeals from an order that granted plaintiff's motion for leave…

Reno v. Wheatland-Chili Cent. Sch. Dist.

Memorandum: Defendant-appellant (defendant) appeals from an order that granted plaintiff's motion for leave…