From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dentel v. Cain

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Aug 24, 2023
2:20-cv-02122-MK (D. Or. Aug. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02122-MK

08-24-2023

JAMES WYATT DENTEL Petitioner, v. BRAD CAIN Respondent.


ORDER

Michael McShane, United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 50), and the matter is now before this Court on Petitioner's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 50) is adopted in full. Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF NO. 1) is DENIED. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dentel v. Cain

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Aug 24, 2023
2:20-cv-02122-MK (D. Or. Aug. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Dentel v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WYATT DENTEL Petitioner, v. BRAD CAIN Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Aug 24, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-02122-MK (D. Or. Aug. 24, 2023)