From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dent v. Margaret Ann Super Markets, Fla.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Apr 20, 1951
52 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 1951)

Opinion

April 20, 1951.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Marshall C. Wiseheart, J.

Cushman, Woodard Gotthardt, Miami, for appellant.

Choate Sinclair, Miami, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order granting a motion for new trial in a suit filed by appellant against appellee to recover damages for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution, a verdict having been returned in appellant's favor.

This court has many times held that the granting of a new trial rests primarily in the sound legal discretion of the trial court, and that his determination will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion. See Florida Coastal Theatres, Inc., v. Belflower, 159 Fla. 741, 32 So.2d 738, and cases therein cited. No such abuse of discretion has been shown; and, accordingly, the order granting a new trial should be and it is hereby

Affirmed.

SEBRING, C.J., and CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dent v. Margaret Ann Super Markets, Fla.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Apr 20, 1951
52 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 1951)
Case details for

Dent v. Margaret Ann Super Markets, Fla.

Case Details

Full title:DENT v. MARGARET ANN SUPER MARKETS, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Apr 20, 1951

Citations

52 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 1951)

Citing Cases

Wiggs v. Loftin

It is well settled that an order granting a new trial will not be disturbed by this court except upon a clear…

Tye v. Ruark ex rel. Ruark

It is more than well established that trial courts are allowed a very broad and liberal discretion in…