From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Denson v. Maifeld

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 17, 2013
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02087-KLM (D. Colo. May. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02087-KLM

05-17-2013

SAMMIE LEE DENSON, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR L. MAIFELD, Defendant.


FINAL JUDGMENT

This matter was tried before a jury on April 15-17, 2013. At the conclusion of the trial the jury rendered a verdict in favor of Defendant, finding by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant did not retaliate against Plaintiff in violation of the Constitution of the United States. See Verdict Form [#139-1] at 1. Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered in this matter as follows.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, each party to bear his or her own costs. This action is hereby terminated.

Dated: May 17, 2013 at Denver, Colorado.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY THE COURT:

Kristen L. Mix

United States Magistrate Judge

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: __________

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Denson v. Maifeld

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 17, 2013
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02087-KLM (D. Colo. May. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Denson v. Maifeld

Case Details

Full title:SAMMIE LEE DENSON, Plaintiff, v. MAJOR L. MAIFELD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 17, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02087-KLM (D. Colo. May. 17, 2013)